Entries Tagged as 'Reading'

Defining Community

I sit at my computer most mornings to read the daily digest from several email discussion lists. People ask questions, offer opinions, share information.

I recently asked for recommendations of good house painters on the neighborhood email list, a group with 190 participants. Five replies came in, all sent only to my email address, not to the list.

Why would people choose to keep such responses private? The topic was far from sensitive, unless the forum is filled with people who paint houses for a living.

If the Internet is about community, and if it’s true that we all want to share, what accounts for people’s reluctance to post publicly on such discussion forums?

Do email discussion lists attract a more selectively social, less open, less trusting group of individuals than do some of the big-name social media sites? (Even the terms of the discussion assume that openness is good, that reserve is bad.)

A recent study from the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project “explored people’s overall social networks and how use of these technologies is related to trust, tolerance, social support, and community and political engagement.”

Take a look at the summary or the full report.

Thanks to San Francisco Chronicle business and technology reporter Benny Evangelista for his June 18 article about the study.

Sources

Benny Evangelista, Web Users Have Better Social Lives, Study Finds (published in hard copy as “Facebook Can Bring Friends, Trust, Support”), San Francisco Chronicle, June 18, 2011.

Keith Hampton, Lauren Sessions Goulet, Lee Rainie, Kristen Purcell, Social Networking Sites and Our Lives, Pew Research Centers Internet & American Life Project, June 16, 2011.

Mistakes and Successes

“Perhaps each book is a mistake I want to correct with the next book,” says artist, designer, and book maker Irma Boom in this six-minute video.

You can learn more about the artist on Irma Boom’s website.

Source
Suzanne Labarre, Irma Boom, Genius Bookmaker, on How She Works [Video], Fast Company, no date.

Measuring Success: Look Beyond the Numbers

A 37 percent success rate would get your program cut in big business.

But for graduates of an Alameda County (California) program that offers at-risk young people the chance to train as emergency medical technicians, it may be enough.

Since 2002, writes Scott Johnson of the Bay Area News Group, the Bay EMT program has offered “two five-month courses each year… to 30 students” at a time. “Nearly 200 students have gone on to successful medical and firefighting careers.”

Says one recent graduate:

I’d never been the guy in class who had the answer… I’d never felt like that before, like I had something to look forward to.

Can our society afford to live without this particular kind of success?

Source

Scott Johnson, Transforming Lives Through Emergency Medical Technician Program, Feb. 21, 2011; published in Contra Costa Times print edition as “A Lifesaving Program.”

Why Write? Roger Rosenblatt Responds

“Why write?” asked interviewer Jeffrey Brown of author Roger Rosenblatt, author of the new book Unless It Moves The Human Heart: The Craft and Art of Writing.

“We write to make suffering endurable, evil intelligible, justice desirable, and love possible.”

Rosenblatt advises students of writing to “strive for anticipation, rather than surprise, imagination, rather than invention,… and to write with precision and restraint.”

Read the transcript or watch the video of this interview on PBS Newshour, January 31, 2011.

Thanks for the pointer, MC.

Look Again: Successful High-Tech Entrepreneurs

Stefan Theil shatters a few myths in this piece from Newsweek:

“As it turns out, the average founder of a high-tech startup isn’t a whiz kid like [Mark] Zuckerberg [of Facebook], but a mature 40-year-old engineer or business type with a spouse and children who simply got tired of working for others, says Duke University scholar Vivek Wadhwa, who studied 549 successful technology ventures.

“What’s more, he says, older entrepreneurs have higher success rates.”

Incidentally, the version published in the hard-copy September 6, 2010, issue is only two paragraphs long, whereas the Web version runs four times as long.

That’s some skillful editing, but I was surprised to find the longer version on the Web, with only a digest in hard copy. This seems like a reversal of recent publishing practice.

Invisible Caregivers

“According to the National Alliance for Caregiving, about 50 million Americans are providing some care for an adult family member. I was swimming in an invisible crowd of caregivers every day,” writes Jonathan Rauch in the Atlantic Monthly.

How to Get Published

What are the differences between traditional publishing, vanity press, and self-publishing? How do the newer print-on-demand options compare?

Writer Carla King takes a look at the issues in her PBS MediaShift column, Self-Publishing, Author Services Open Floodgates for Writers.

Out of the Way, Gramps: Internet Use Among Young Millenials

“Blogging has become so 2006,” writes tech journalist Benny Evangelista, citing a Pew Center Research report titled Social Media & Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults, a group also known as the millenials.

Sources

. Benny Evangelista, Blogging Is for Old People, Pew Report Finds (published as “Teens Prefer Facebook, Report Finds” in paper/hard-copy edition), San Francisco Chronicle, Feb. 4, 2010.
. Scott Keeter and Paul Taylor, The Millennials, Pew Research Center, Dec. 11, 1009.
. Amanda Lenhart, Kristen Purcell, Aaron Smith, and Kathryn Zickuhr, Social Media & Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Feb. 3, 2010.

William Zinsser: Writing English as a Second Language

William Zinsser, author of On Writing Well and other wonderful how-to books, tells international students at Columbia University: “As you start your journey…, you may tell yourself that you’re doing ‘communications,’ or ‘new media,’ or ‘digital media’ or some other fashionable new form. But ultimately you’re in the storytelling business.”

Source

William Zinsser, Writing English as a Second Language, The American Scholar, Winter 2010.

Social Networking, Privacy, and the Law

If a police investigator finds Facebook photos that prove that you were in a Hawaii triathlon last month, at the same time that you were receiving disability payments from your home state, has the investigator broken the law?

San Francisco Chronicle journalist Bob Egelko examines a few such cases and writes that the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed suit this week to help define those legal limits. Along the way, he speaks with Shane Witnov, who has helped write “guidelines for lawyers’ use of social networking sites.”

Sources

. Bob Egelko, Suit Wants Details About Cops’ Online Probes, San Francisco Chronicle, Dec. 5, 2009.
. “Social Networks: Friends or Foes? Confronting Online Legal and Ethical Issues in the Age of Social Networking,” a conference held on Oct. 23, 2009, UC Berkeley School of Law, MP3 recordings and readings.
. David Lee and Shane Witnov, Handbook on Conducting Research on Social-Networking Websites in California, Dec. 1, 2008.

Web Usability: Users Want to Go Faster and Have More Control

Jakob Nielsen provides some interesting information about computer users’ tolerance for interactions on web sites in the Alertbox posting “Powers of 10: Time Scales in User Experience.”

Writes Nielsen: “0.1 second is the response time limit if you want users to feel like their actions are directly causing something to happen on the screen.”

Worse yet: “The average page visit lasts about 30 seconds, but the more experienced the users are, the less time they allocate to each Web page.”

If you’re posting a video, he writes, don’t run anything longer than 1 to 2 minutes.

Lighten up, babe.

Source

Jakob Nielsen, Powers of 10: Time Scales in User Experience, Alertbox, Oct. 5, 2009.

Turning Things Around: Some Responses to a Layoff

Companies lay off workers in an effort to cut costs and raise the value of their publicly traded stock. News of a layoff, downsizing, or reduction in force (RIF) is usually welcome to a company’s investors, but it is much less so to the people who are laid off.

Here are three people who have changed a layoff into something more positive.

When Life Hands You Lemons

After her husband was laid off from Sun Microsystems in 2008, Katy Dickinson wrote this excellent list of things to consider before and after you are laid off: After the RIF Notice, Before You Leave. Skip the Sun-specific stuff if you’re not an employee of that company, but you may find some of the rest useful.

Add Chutzpah

Laurent Bridenne wants a job, and to prove just how much he wants that job, he’s offering to give the first paycheck to the person who helps him find the new position. If you’d like to keep up with his further exploits in the world of digital media, take a look at his new blog.

Create Bridges to Jobs

In the article East Bay Man Turns Unemployment into Opportunity, journalist
Linh Tat of the Oakland Tribune writes about Chuck Castagnolo, who decided to use his experiences with downsizing to help others deal with unemployment and find new work. In the process, he found himself a new job and a new direction.

Sources

Laurent Bridenne, Welcome to the Program, Nov. 5, 2009.
Katy Dickinson, After the RIF Notice, Before You Leave, Jan. 15, 2009.
Linh Tat, East Bay Man Turns Unemployment into Opportunity, Oakland Tribune, Nov. 9, 2009.

Getting Things Done: Report on a Workshop

These are my notes from a one-day workshop I took in December 2008, courtesy of Sun Microsystems. Many of the suggestions noted here have proved useful in my day-to-day work. Perhaps they will be useful for you as well.

In the workshop “Getting Things Done: Mastering Workflow,” instructor Chris McIntyre began by asking attendees two questions:

  • How productive are you, on a scale from 1 to 10, with 1 as unproductive and 10 as a productive fireball?
  • If you rated yourself at less than 10, what keeps you from doing better?

Surprisingly enough, almost everyone in the room of 20 people rated him- or herself at 7: quite productive, but with room for improvement.

Using the David Allen Company‘s approach, Chris introduced us to some new definitions and concepts.

First, he defined the term work as “anything that needs to be different than it is now.”

Second, he included in that definition things that most of us usually classify as belonging more in the personal category, not work: picking up milk on the way home, calling the dentist for an appointment, and so on.

He classified all of us in the room (all Sun employees) as “knowledge workers,” to use Peter Drucker‘s phrase, not the “makers and movers” (or industrial workers) of previous decades. For a knowledge worker, 80 percent of the job is undefined. You get a directive, then figure out the process: You analyze the parts of the task, define its starting and ending points, and produce.

Knowledge workers also use tools that allow them to move fluidly between work and home, sometimes blurring the lines. Anyone who’s checked that work email account one last time 10 minutes before going to bed and then spent an hour at the computer dealing with it knows about this.

The David Allen company has come up with a five-step process to help knowledge workers get things done (GTD):

  1. Collect
  2. Process
  3. Organize
  4. Review
  5. Do

1. Collect

Collect the to-do or tasks list not in your mind but in some physical place, whether on your paper planner or computer. According to studies, Chris told us, the human mind can hold only 7 items in short-term memory. Typically, when we try to hold any more in there, something else drops out. (“Oops, I forgot to buy milk.”) Even if you pride yourself on your memory, “If it’s in your mind, it’s in the wrong place.”

Chris suggested you get an inbox, a physical box or folder that goes on your desk. Put into it your mail, your grocery list, anything that is occupying mental space and needs to be dealt with. Too many of us just stack things up and then look at the stack only later in a panic. Create a single place to collect the paper that comes in.

Every 24 to 48 hours, process whatever is in the inbox. File the pieces of paper; pay the bills; send off your expense report; put your used event tickets in the scrapbook or the recycling bin. Deal with the incoming stuff on a regular basis. Stop creating stacks of paper on top of stacks, then panicking when you need to find something in a hurry. As Chris put it, “The best practice is to do it when it shows up. The worst practice is to do it when it blows up.” You become addicted to crises and consider yourself productive only when you respond to a crisis. This is exhausting and leads to burnout.

People collect their information in multiple ways, so choose what’s best for you: a physical inbox or folder, paper journals or pads, electronic notes, voicemail, email, dictation tools, jott.com. Whatever you use, go through and deal with the incoming stuff within 48 hours. Read the email all the way through if needed, respond if needed, then delete. Decide what you need to do with your paper note, do what you need to do with the task, and recycle the note. And so on.

The aim is to get the inbox to empty every 24 to 48 hours.

As you work in the coming week, notice when you get to feeling productive. Note what you did to get there, and try to repeat that series of steps. You’ll likely find that you’re at your most productive when you’re relaxing into your work, doing what you know best how to do.

2. Process

Ask yourself these questions as you process a given project:

  • What is the desired outcome of the project? What does done look like?
  • What is the next action that I can take to get just one step closer to done?

Chris defines the term project as anything that takes more than one step. If the project is having a dental checkup, step 1 might be to call for an appointment, step 2 to get to the dentist’s office. If the project is to create a new software application, step 1 may be meeting with the client or manager to figure out the endpoint.

Chris’s point is that in many cases, we need to figure out only one next action. We don’t have to plot out every step of the project before we dive in and get something done. We waste a lot of time freaking ourselves out about all that we cannot get done because someone else owns the next step or is causing a delay. Just work on taking the one step with the part of the project that you can control.

Once you have the answers to those two questions — What is the desired outcome? What is the next action that I can take? — put the answers in a system you trust, whether that’s on your computer or in your planner. Follow this two-step process over and over with every project: Decide and move.

3. Organize

Chris recommended the Mozilla Firefox add-on Lightning as a great way for people in an email-rich company culture to organize tasks. Lightning adds customizable Calendar and Tasks windows to the Mozilla Thunderbird email client.

The Lightning calendar function allows you to track three things: time-specific actions (“meet w/ Gordon at 5″), day-specific actions (“review presentation on Thurs.”), and day-specific information (holiday, colleague’s birthday). The Tasks function allows you to track the tasks that you need to get done, due date and time, and status.

Chris showed us the categories he uses to track his tasks:

  • Agendas: agendas for upcoming meetings
  • Anywhere (remote): clerical tasks that he can do anywhere (make lists, type up notes, etc.)
  • Computer: research to do online
  • Errands: anything that requires going to another space
  • Home: to-do list for home or personal tasks
  • Office: work for David Allen company and clients
  • Waiting for: project in process, his next step waiting for someone else to complete theirs

Not too surprisingly, the “Waiting for” category had the most items under it.

I’ve started to use these tools and am finding them useful. For instance, Lightning has an electronic nag feature that tells me how many hours I have left to get something done and then how far behind I am with it. If you’re like me and need that kind of nudge, this can be very useful.

For email management, Chris suggested first using the 2-minute rule: If you can take care of any email in 2 minutes, process the 2-minute mails first.

Next, sort emails by date, by subject, or by sender. He’s created 2 folders in his inbox, Action and Waiting for, and he drops any emails that he needs to hold on to into those categories. He also has a Reference or Archive folder, in which he files any nonactionable mails that he’ll need to keep track of, typically ones he’s CC’d on. He freely uses the Delete key.

Read an email, process it, and delete it if there’s nothing actionable in it for you. Decide and move on.

If you like keeping paper files, he suggested the following categories for folders:

  • Inbox: process every 24 to 48 hours
  • To Home
  • To Office
  • Bills
  • To Be Filed
  • Action Support: for example, receipts for which you’re going to file an expense report
  • Read and Review: articles, presentations, etc. to read later

4. Review

To get the most out of this system, you have to monitor how it’s working for you and make sure to keep up with it. If you fall behind, you’re likely to go back to old habits and stress out your short-term memory. The system only works if you continue to use it, and that requires taking time to regroup and readjust. The David Allen folks recommend that you do a weekly review at a time that’s convenient, perhaps Fridays after lunch.

In the review, ask yourself:

  • What do you look at in all this and when?
  • What do you need to do, how often, to ensure that this works as a consistent system, freeing you up to think and manage at a higher level?

5. Do

Use the processes outlined here to get things done. They work only if you keep up with them.

Parting Words

Here are a few nuggets of wisdom I picked up:

  • 2-minute rule: If you can respond to someone and get a task done in 2 minutes, do it right away.
  • If you’re saying yes to every project on the job, you’re probably saying no to something at home.
  • Procrastination takes a lot of mental energy and diminishes the limited time you already have. Decide whether to do the task or not. Focus on the desired outcome and decide the one next action needed.

You can find more details about this process in the book Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity, by David Allen.

Good News: California Dreamin’

There’s good news from California, according to Time magazine: “Given up for dead by some, the Golden State is still a mirror of the nation’s future politics, economics and demographics. While the rest of the nation catches up to life on the coast, California is home to industries, laboratories and technologies that will go a long way toward determining how we live in the 21st century.”

Source

Michael Grunwald, Despite Its Woes, California’s Dream Still Lives, Time, Oct. 23, 2009.

New Blog Home

Dear reader: Welcome to my new blog home. I’ve just imported most of the content from its previous home at blogs.sun.com/plaintext/ and will take some time getting used to the new surroundings. Thanks for coming along for the ride.